Evaluation of antimicrobial, antioxidant properties and toxicity of ๐˜–๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ฎ๐˜ถ๐˜ฎ ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ถ๐˜ช๐˜ง๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ถ๐˜ฎ L. extracts

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Postgraduate Institute of Science (PGIS), University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka

Abstract

Oral health is altered by pathogens and is a global health concern due to antimicrobial resistance. ๐˜–๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ฎ๐˜ถ๐˜ฎ ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ถ๐˜ช๐˜ง๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ถ๐˜ฎ L. is widely recognized for its therapeutic potential in traditional medical systems. The objectives of the current study were to evaluate the antimicrobial, antioxidant properties and toxicity of crude ethanolic and aqueous extracts of the leaves of ๐˜–. ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ถ๐˜ช๐˜ง๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ถ๐˜ฎ. Ethanolic extracts of young, fresh leaves were prepared using ultrasonication (35 โ€“ 40 ยฐC, 20 kHz, 15 min) and vacuum infiltration (25 โ€“ 30 โ„ƒ, 1400 rpm, one h). Cold extraction was done by soaking paste in sterile distilled water at 27 ยฑ 1 โ„ƒ overnight and the filtrate was used as the aqueous extract. The antimicrobial activity was assessed using agar well diffusion bioassay in Mueller Hinton Agar against reference cultures of oral pathogens; ๐˜š๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ฑ๐˜ฉ๐˜บ๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ค๐˜ค๐˜ถ๐˜ด ๐˜ข๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ถ๐˜ด, ๐˜š๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฑ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ค๐˜ค๐˜ถ๐˜ด ๐˜ฑ๐˜บ๐˜ฐ๐˜จ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด and ๐˜Š๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ข ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ฃ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ด, ๐˜Š. ๐˜จ๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ฃ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ข, ๐˜Š. ๐˜ฌ๐˜ณ๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ช, ๐˜Š. ๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฑ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ด, ๐˜Š. ๐˜ฑ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ฑ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ด and 30 clinical isolates of ๐˜Š๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ข spp. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using the agar dilution method. Antioxidant capacity was analysed using 1,1-diphenyl-2 picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH) free-radical scavenging assay, while toxicity was assessed using the brine shrimp lethality assay. A significant antimicrobial activity was observed with ultrasonicated ethanolic extracts (๐˜ฑ < 0.05) over vacuum infiltrated extracts. The ultrasonicated extracts showed a higher mean inhibition for ๐˜Š๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ข clinical isolates than vacuum infiltrated extracts (๐˜ฑ = 9.24ร—10-5). The lowest MIC of 2.56 mg mLโปยน was observed against ๐˜š. ๐˜ข๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ถ๐˜ด. Aqueous extracts did not show antimicrobial activity. Antioxidant capacity was higher in ultrasonicated extracts (ICโ‚…โ‚€ = 45.53 mg mLโปยน) over vacuum infiltrated extracts (ICโ‚…โ‚€ = 60.96 mg mLโปยน), though the difference was not significant (๐˜ฑ = 0.40). Ultrasonicated extracts showed significantly low toxicity (LCโ‚…โ‚€ of 9.20ร—10โตโ€ฏmg kgโปยน), markedly lower than atropine, confirming its safe profile. Overall, ethanolic extracts of ๐˜–. ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ถ๐˜ช๐˜ง๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ถ๐˜ฎ possess antimicrobial and antioxidant properties, and ultrasonication is a more effective extraction method than vacuum infiltration for isolating bioactive compounds.

Description

Citation

Proceedings of the Postgraduate Institute of Science Research Congress (RESCON) -2025, University of Peradeniya, P 132

Collections