Choice of the inverse linear mapping in the method of directly defining the inverse mapping for inhomogeneous heat and advection problems

dc.contributor.authorSahabandu, C.W.
dc.contributor.authorDewasurendra, M.
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-22T05:21:18Z
dc.date.available2026-06-22T05:21:18Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-20
dc.description.abstractSemi-analytical methods for solving nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs) combine aspects of both analytical and numerical techniques. Unlike linear PDEs, which can be more straightforwardly solved using the separation of variables and superposition principles, nonlinear PDEs involve terms with nonlinear dependencies, making them significantly more complex to handle. The key to the analytical method lies in employing techniques like perturbation methods, similarity transformations, and integral transformations such as Fourier and Laplace transform to simplify the equations. These techniques often lead to obtaining exact solutions or approximations that provide valuable insights into the behavior of the system. However, due to the intricate nature of nonlinear PDEs, the analytical method may not always be applicable, and in these cases, numerical methods or approximate techniques become necessary. The Method of Directly Defining the inverse Mapping (MDDiM) is a semi-analytical method for obtaining approximate solutions for complicated nonlinear PDEs without using any kind of transformation. In this study, we explore different inverse linear mappings in order to determine the optimal inverse linear mapping that allows accuracy just after a few terms are evaluated by applying MDDiM to the inhomogeneous heat and advection problems. Additionally, we optimize the convergence control parameter by constructing an optimum control problem for minimizing the accumulated L2-norm of the squared residual errors using directed sum. This approach is far easier to compute than the square integrals of an infinite domain. By computing three-term optimal approximate solutions and comparing them with the exact solutions, we were able to choose the better inverse linear mapping for these two inhomogeneous PDEs. We can conclude that choosing a better inverse linear mapping leads to a more accurate solution in MDDiM.
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of the Peradeniya University International Research Sessions (iPURSE) – 2023, University of Peradeniya, P 213
dc.identifier.issn1391-4111
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.lib.pdn.ac.lk/handle/20.500.14444/7820
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
dc.subjectAdvection Problems
dc.subjectConvergence control parameter
dc.subjectHeat Problem
dc.subjectInverse linear mapping
dc.subjectMethod of Directly Defining the inverse Mapping
dc.titleChoice of the inverse linear mapping in the method of directly defining the inverse mapping for inhomogeneous heat and advection problems
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
C.W. Sahabandu.pdf
Size:
7.47 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:

Collections